<html dir="ltr">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<style id="owaParaStyle" type="text/css">P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}</style>
</head>
<body ocsi="0" fpstyle="1">
<div style="direction: ltr;font-family: Tahoma;color: #000000;font-size: 10pt;"><font color="black" face="Tahoma" size="2"><span style="font-size:10pt;" dir="ltr">Hello again,<br>
I have run some datasynth simulations using the inflammation substrate and different values for the permeability, eg:<br>
<br>
datasynth -walkers 1000000 -tmax 5000 -voxels 1 -p 0.4 -schemefile mySch.scheme -initial uniform -substrate inflammation -increments 1 -gamma 10 8E-7 -substratesize 1.7E-4 -numcylinders 100 -seed 123456789 > ppt4.Bfloat
<br>
<br>
Having done this using -p 0.0, -p 0.4, -p 0.8 and -p 1.0, the generated signals are exactly the same in each run, for a range of q-values and big deltas. The fact there is no difference in signal between -p 0.0 (impermeable) and -p 1.0 (fully permeable) makes
me think I've made a mistake somewhere? Or are non-zero permeabilities not compatible with the inflammation substrate?<br>
<br>
Also, is there a substrate option for specifying randomly placed but uniformly sized cylinders?<br>
<br>
Many thanks,<br>
Damien</span></font></div>
</body>
</html>