<div dir="ltr">Hi Dorian,<div><br></div><div>That's a bit lower than I'd expect, I typically see about 3/4 of the b=0 intensity (I think). That's for a b-value of ~3000, I would expect it to be lower than that for higher b-values. Basically, the first term in the response function multiplied by ~0.28 should correspond to the mean DW intensity averaged over all orientations. If that's not the case, I would have a good look at your single-fibre mask (the mask from which you estimate the response function), to make sure that all voxels included are in sensible, single-fibre, pure WM locations. I also assume this is a healthy volunteer? Otherwise T2 hyperintensity could explain this. If none of this helps, maybe you can post an image of the response function, its coefficients, and the b-value, SNR and number of directions of the data set, just in case we can spot anything obvious from them...</div>
<div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div><br></div><div>Donald.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 25 October 2013 16:21, Dorian P. <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:alb.net@gmail.com" target="_blank">alb.net@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Hi again MRtrix group,<div><br></div><div>My processing works fine and I see the doughnut shape of the response function. On checking some quality parameters I noticed that my response function starts from ~110 while white matter values on b0 are around 350-450. Is this normal or should I look at anything to improve?</div>
<div><br></div><div>This is not just a case as I have two HARDIs from the same subject, both around those values.</div><div><br></div><div>Thank you.</div><div><br></div><div>Dorian</div><div>TJU</div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Mrtrix-discussion mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Mrtrix-discussion@www.nitrc.org">Mrtrix-discussion@www.nitrc.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.nitrc.org/mailman/listinfo/mrtrix-discussion" target="_blank">http://www.nitrc.org/mailman/listinfo/mrtrix-discussion</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr"><b><font color="#990000">Dr J-Donald Tournier (PhD)</font></b><br><div><font color="#990000"><br></font></div><i><font color="#990000">Senior Lecturer, </font></i><i><font color="#990000">Biomedical Engineering</font></i><div>
<i><font color="#990000">Division of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering<br>King's College London</font></i><div><i><font color="#990000"><br></font></i></div><div><i><font color="#990000"><b style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:15px"><span style="font-size:10pt">A:</span></b><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:10pt"> Department of Perinatal Imaging & Health, 1<sup>st</sup> Floor South Wing, St Thomas' Hospital, London. SE1 7EH</span><br>
</font></i></div><div><i><font color="#990000"><b>T:</b> +44 (0)20 7188 7118 ext 53613</font></i></div></div><div><i><font color="#990000"><b>W:</b> <a href="http://www.kcl.ac.uk/medicine/research/divisions/imaging/departments/biomedengineering" target="_blank">http://www.kcl.ac.uk/medicine/research/divisions/imaging/departments/biomedengineering</a></font></i><br>
</div></div>
</div>