open-discussion
open-discussion > RE: VBM results interpretation
Nov 6, 2013 10:11 AM | Ana Enea
RE: VBM results interpretation
Hi,
I also did a VBM analysis on GM images and I have a question If you are kindly enough to respond. Have you noticed that the resulted image from the GLM analysis (a 2-sample T test) is orientated different from the orientation of the preprocessed images? Do you know how come is that? In the first step, the preprocessing, the images are orientated the same as in the aquisition process, but in final after the GLM analyses, are re-orientated as in FSL. If I overlay the Avg152T1 template over the results the orientation is still different from the initial one, even though at the beginning the template was orientated the same as a the aquisition. The images were converted with spm so is all from the program.
Please help and reply!
Thank you!
Kindly regards,
Ana
I also did a VBM analysis on GM images and I have a question If you are kindly enough to respond. Have you noticed that the resulted image from the GLM analysis (a 2-sample T test) is orientated different from the orientation of the preprocessed images? Do you know how come is that? In the first step, the preprocessing, the images are orientated the same as in the aquisition process, but in final after the GLM analyses, are re-orientated as in FSL. If I overlay the Avg152T1 template over the results the orientation is still different from the initial one, even though at the beginning the template was orientated the same as a the aquisition. The images were converted with spm so is all from the program.
Please help and reply!
Thank you!
Kindly regards,
Ana
Threaded View
Title | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
Tanmay Nath | Jun 11, 2012 | |
Ana Enea | Nov 6, 2013 | |
Ged Ridgway | Nov 6, 2013 | |
Ana Enea | Nov 6, 2013 | |
Ged Ridgway | Nov 6, 2013 | |
Ana Enea | Nov 6, 2013 | |
Rayana Braich | Jul 18, 2012 | |
Ged Ridgway | Jun 18, 2012 | |
Tanmay Nath | Jun 19, 2012 | |
Ged Ridgway | Jun 19, 2012 | |
Tanmay Nath | Jun 19, 2012 | |