[Mrtrix-discussion] use of -mask with streamtrack

[Ian Malone]

Thanks, I suspect this is what people would normally expect when using a 
mask.  Though presumably there's a reason for the way it works at the 
moment?

Ian

Donald Tournier wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> OK, I'll modify the behaviour with respect to mask termination for the
> next release.
>
> If anyone else has any objections to this, please speak out now or
> forever hold your peace...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Donald.
>
>
> On 2 March 2010 02:47, Ian Malone <ian.malone at drc.ion.ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
>   
>> It was a bit of a surprise to find out; we've been able to work round it for
>> what we're doing by moving towards the middle of the track until back inside
>> the mask.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ian
>>
>> Donald Tournier wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ian,
>>
>> Yes, that's the expected behaviour. The track gets terminated just
>> after it's left the mask. I can see that this may not always be
>> desirable/expected. I could potentially change it do terminate just
>> inside the mask, if that is something that people need?
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Donald.
>>
>>
>> On 26 February 2010 04:42, Ian Malone <ian.malone at drc.ion.ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm using streamtrack to do whole-brain tracking and finding that, when
>> using the -mask option, tracks terminate just beyond the mask, whereas I'd
>> expect them to finish inside the mask. Is this the expected behaviour?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ian Malone
>>
>> --
>> Research Associate
>> Dementia Research Centre
>> UCL
>> Institute of Neurology
>> Queen Square
>> London WC1N 3BG
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mrtrix-discussion mailing list
>> Mrtrix-discussion at www.nitrc.org
>> http://www.nitrc.org/mailman/listinfo/mrtrix-discussion
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.nitrc.org/pipermail/mrtrix-discussion/attachments/20100303/0737c57d/attachment.html