help > Brunner-Munzel test in NiiStat
Showing 1-2 of 2 posts
Apr 19, 2022 11:04 AM | Lars Eirik Bø
Brunner-Munzel test in NiiStat
Hi,
I see in this forum that the NPM has now been replaced with NiiStat. As far as I understand, NPM supported the use of the Brunner-Munzel test for creating VLSMs, but in the NiiStat introduction it states that "[r]esults are identical to a Student's pooled-variance t-test (if one of the dimensions is binomial)". Does that mean that NiiStat does not support the Brunner-Munzel test?
TIA
Lars Eirik
(PS. I tried asking about this in the NiiStat help forum, but didn't get an answer, so I thought I'd try this forum, as it seems more active.)
I see in this forum that the NPM has now been replaced with NiiStat. As far as I understand, NPM supported the use of the Brunner-Munzel test for creating VLSMs, but in the NiiStat introduction it states that "[r]esults are identical to a Student's pooled-variance t-test (if one of the dimensions is binomial)". Does that mean that NiiStat does not support the Brunner-Munzel test?
TIA
Lars Eirik
(PS. I tried asking about this in the NiiStat help forum, but didn't get an answer, so I thought I'd try this forum, as it seems more active.)
May 24, 2022 01:05 PM | Chris Rorden
RE: Brunner-Munzel test in NiiStat
True, NiiStat no longer includes the Brunner-Munzel test. The
results are therefore GLM (e.g. where the mean is the best measure
of central difference). In general, the Brunner-Munzel test is a
bit more sensitive if the assumptions of the GLM are violated (I
like to think the BM test generally detects differences in median).
However, both provide robust permutation based thresholding for
family wise error, and NiiStat includes the ability to model
nuisance regressors. I do think that NPM is robust, I am simply
spread too thin to support a lot of these older projects. All the
source code is open source, so any one can extend or maintain these
legacy tools.