open-discussion
open-discussion > RE: Resting-state seed connectivity analysis
Sep 11, 2015 02:09 PM | Jean-Baptiste Poline
RE: Resting-state seed connectivity analysis
Hi,
If you are creating t-maps or estimated parameters maps the two approaches should be equivalent (if we ignore degrees of freedom ... ) since the t test will only test for the part of your seed region signal that is uncorrelated to the other parts of the model. The values that should change are the ones of the counfounds (WM CSF movement signals). I would therefore use the approach that you have seen in the litterature so that you have a better estimation of the variance of your parameters (correct df).
cheers
JB
If you are creating t-maps or estimated parameters maps the two approaches should be equivalent (if we ignore degrees of freedom ... ) since the t test will only test for the part of your seed region signal that is uncorrelated to the other parts of the model. The values that should change are the ones of the counfounds (WM CSF movement signals). I would therefore use the approach that you have seen in the litterature so that you have a better estimation of the variance of your parameters (correct df).
cheers
JB
Threaded View
Title | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
Andrew Song | Aug 28, 2015 | |
ladan shahshahani | Oct 30, 2015 | |
Jean-Baptiste Poline | Sep 11, 2015 | |
Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Sep 11, 2015 | |