help
help > RE: contrast ANOVA
Nov 9, 2017 03:11 PM | Charanya Muralidharan - IU School of Medicine
RE: contrast ANOVA
Hello Dr. Zalensky,
We are trying to perform ANOVA with our test sample set of 52 individuals (4 independent groups). I have a question about design matrix, contrast and FDR method. We followed the suggestion provided by you in this forum with reference to design matrix and contrast settings. We tested the following design and contrast settings.
Design 1:
1 1 0 0
1 1 0 0
1 -1 1 0
1 -1 1 0
1 0 -1 1
1 0 -1 1
1 0 0 -1
1 0 0 -1 Contrast set to [0 1 1 1]
Design 2:
1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 1
0 0 0 1 Contrast set to [1 1 1 1]
I ran both these settings with F-test and FDR set to permutations 50000. Both of them resulted in no significant results. However, when I tested them with permutation of 5000, design 1 gave me more significant edges than design 2. Considering both the matrices and their corresponding contrasts are equivalent, why would one see a discrepancy? Is it due to insufficient number of permutations? Is there a resource explaining why FDR requires more permutations than NBS?
Your thoughts would be really helpful!
Thank you
Charanya
We are trying to perform ANOVA with our test sample set of 52 individuals (4 independent groups). I have a question about design matrix, contrast and FDR method. We followed the suggestion provided by you in this forum with reference to design matrix and contrast settings. We tested the following design and contrast settings.
Design 1:
1 1 0 0
1 1 0 0
1 -1 1 0
1 -1 1 0
1 0 -1 1
1 0 -1 1
1 0 0 -1
1 0 0 -1 Contrast set to [0 1 1 1]
Design 2:
1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 1
0 0 0 1 Contrast set to [1 1 1 1]
I ran both these settings with F-test and FDR set to permutations 50000. Both of them resulted in no significant results. However, when I tested them with permutation of 5000, design 1 gave me more significant edges than design 2. Considering both the matrices and their corresponding contrasts are equivalent, why would one see a discrepancy? Is it due to insufficient number of permutations? Is there a resource explaining why FDR requires more permutations than NBS?
Your thoughts would be really helpful!
Thank you
Charanya
Threaded View
Title | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
Andreas Hahn | Nov 14, 2014 | |
Andrew Zalesky | Nov 16, 2014 | |
Charanya Muralidharan | Nov 9, 2017 | |
Andrew Zalesky | Nov 10, 2017 | |
Charanya Muralidharan | Nov 13, 2017 | |
Yuan-Fang Zhao | Oct 14, 2016 | |
Andrew Zalesky | Oct 15, 2016 | |
Andreas Hahn | Nov 18, 2014 | |
Andrew Zalesky | Nov 19, 2014 | |