devel
devel > RE: compatability testing
Dec 14, 2010 09:12 PM | Nick Schmansky
RE: compatability testing
Hi,
I agree with everything you say. My initial attempt started from a 'path of least resistance' conceptual framework, in terms of keeping the testing as simple as possible, with the intent to make changes as encountered. This did not last long as I encountered when running the test plan script for freesurfer the very problems you describe: freesurfer has default data types (base64 gzipped), and doesnt track the format read as input (so cant easily 'echo' it as output).
So I will modify the test plan doc to describe the allowable variances you mention.
Nick
I agree with everything you say. My initial attempt started from a 'path of least resistance' conceptual framework, in terms of keeping the testing as simple as possible, with the intent to make changes as encountered. This did not last long as I encountered when running the test plan script for freesurfer the very problems you describe: freesurfer has default data types (base64 gzipped), and doesnt track the format read as input (so cant easily 'echo' it as output).
So I will modify the test plan doc to describe the allowable variances you mention.
Nick
Threaded View
Title | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
Richard Reynolds | Nov 1, 2010 | |
Nick Schmansky | Dec 14, 2010 | |
Richard Reynolds | Dec 14, 2010 | |