Hi Andrew!
Thanks for all your responses! I just have one last question. What if I want to model a continuous predictor and check whether there exists a linearly increasing subgraph?
Again I have a repeated measure design across 2 drug conditions but I have ~20 FC matrices for each drug condition per subject. I would have 2 questions:
- It is often recommended to demean data across ALL participants.
I am unsure why though. Wouldn't it make more sense to demean for
each subject across drug conditions to account for their individual
differences?
- Would a design matrix like this then be correct?
0 -2 1 0 0 0 ....
0 3 1 0 0 0 ....
1 -0.5 1 0 0 0 ....
0 -8 0 1 0 0 0
The first column denotes drug (0/ placebo; 1/drug)
The second column is the per subject demeaned behavioral rating
Column 3 denotes that the first 3 entries belong to participant
1
Column 4 denotes that the 4th entry belongs to subject 2
The zeros afterwards would have length(subejct)
Thank you for your help!
Cheers,
Max
Threaded View
Title | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
David de Wide | Aug 3, 2017 | |
Max Kathofer | Oct 31, 2024 | |
Andrew Zalesky | Nov 1, 2024 | |
Max Kathofer | Nov 1, 2024 | |
Andrew Zalesky | Nov 1, 2024 | |
Max Kathofer | Dec 2, 2024 | |
Andrew Zalesky | Dec 6, 2024 | |
Max Kathofer | Dec 9, 2024 | |
Andrew Zalesky | Dec 10, 2024 | |
yue zhang | Jan 11, 2020 | |
Andrew Zalesky | Aug 5, 2017 | |
Liam Nestor | Sep 27, 2019 | |
Andrew Zalesky | Sep 28, 2019 | |
Liam Nestor | Sep 28, 2019 | |
Andrew Zalesky | Sep 28, 2019 | |
Liam Nestor | Sep 30, 2019 | |
Andrew Zalesky | Oct 1, 2019 | |
Liam Nestor | Oct 1, 2019 | |
David de Wide | Aug 6, 2017 | |
Andrew Zalesky | Aug 7, 2017 | |
David de Wide | Aug 7, 2017 | |
Andrew Zalesky | Aug 7, 2017 | |
David de Wide | Aug 11, 2017 | |
Andrew Zalesky | Aug 12, 2017 | |
David de Wide | Aug 18, 2017 | |
Andrew Zalesky | Aug 19, 2017 | |