open-discussion
open-discussion > Where to publish comment on a flawed paper?
May 16, 2012 10:05 PM | Torsten Rohlfing
Where to publish comment on a flawed paper?
Let's say you see a technical paper that is clearly and
fundamentally flawed, published in a well-respected journal.
Let's say you obtain the original data from the authors and put together a demonstration that the proposed method isn't working.
Let's say you write a Comment describing your results and send it to said journal.
And let's say the journal editors, while agreeing that you have a valid point, reject your Comment without further consideration because it is "not significant."
Now where else do you send your negative results for publication?
Grateful for any suggestions.
Let's say you obtain the original data from the authors and put together a demonstration that the proposed method isn't working.
Let's say you write a Comment describing your results and send it to said journal.
And let's say the journal editors, while agreeing that you have a valid point, reject your Comment without further consideration because it is "not significant."
Now where else do you send your negative results for publication?
Grateful for any suggestions.
Threaded View
Title | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
Torsten Rohlfing | May 16, 2012 | |
Flavia Filimon | Jun 25, 2012 | |
Torsten Rohlfing | Jun 25, 2012 | |
Torsten Rohlfing | May 17, 2012 | |
Christine Zakrzewski | Jun 25, 2012 | |
Torsten Rohlfing | Jun 25, 2012 | |
juergen haenggi | May 17, 2012 | |
Luis Ibanez | May 17, 2012 | |
Satrajit Ghosh | May 16, 2012 | |
Arnaud Delorme | May 17, 2012 | |
Matthew Brett | May 16, 2012 | |
Moriah Thomason | May 17, 2012 | |
Torsten Rohlfing | May 16, 2012 | |
Ged Ridgway | May 16, 2012 | |
Torsten Rohlfing | Nov 4, 2012 | |
Torsten Rohlfing | Nov 4, 2012 | |
Luis Ibanez | Nov 4, 2012 | |
Torsten Rohlfing | May 16, 2012 | |
Torsten Rohlfing | Jun 19, 2012 | |
Luis Ibanez | Jun 19, 2012 | |