Hi all,

I've been running graph analysis in CONN but would also like to compare results across other toolboxes (e.g., Brain Connectivity). I transformed the z matrices to r, thresholded them at cost (k = .15), and removed NaN values and negative correlations. However, the global efficiency values are noticeably smaller in the Brain Connectivity package compared to CONN. I'm fairly positive that the same equations are used across toolboxes, so I'm not sure why the results would be different. Any insight would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Roger