I actually have a similar question. I am interested in identifying similarity and differences between controls and patients in the correlation between early life trauma severity with function connectivity and controlled age, sex, and headmotion. For within group correlation(such as the control group),  I selected control, patient, control_trauma, patient trauma, age, sex, headmotion, and input contrast as [0 0 1 0 0 0 0]. In the results explorer table, I got

Seed networks.Language.IFG F(29)(105) = 2.88 0 0.0035

Seed IFG tri r F(29)(105) = 2.86 0 0.0035

IFG tri r SubCalC T(133) = -4.06 0.0001 0.0136
IFG tri r Ver45 T(133) = 3.74 0.0003 0.0222

I can understand there was significant positive correlation between IFG trir-subcalc connectivity and trauma severity. How do I read the overall significance of IFG tri  or Seed networks.Language.IFG? Does this mean the connectivity of IFG with all other ROIs I had chosen showed significant correlation with trauma? 

Thanks,


Lihong