open-discussion
open-discussion > RE: VBM results interpretation
Jun 19, 2012 12:06 PM | Tanmay Nath
RE: VBM results interpretation
Dear Ged,
Thanks for the reply.
I was using Absolute threshold of thresholding as 0.1. I was also using the implicit mask and was not using the explicit mask.Also, i was using the Avg152T1.nii image in the canonical directory of the SPM as my image to overlay my result. I will look at the documentation of Imcalc() and try to make the average template of my spatially normalised bias corrected images which i got during the segmentation process.
I will try your suggestions and also try to make a tighter mask.
Thanks
Tanmay
Thanks for the reply.
I was using Absolute threshold of thresholding as 0.1. I was also using the implicit mask and was not using the explicit mask.Also, i was using the Avg152T1.nii image in the canonical directory of the SPM as my image to overlay my result. I will look at the documentation of Imcalc() and try to make the average template of my spatially normalised bias corrected images which i got during the segmentation process.
I will try your suggestions and also try to make a tighter mask.
Thanks
Tanmay
Threaded View
Title | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
Tanmay Nath | Jun 11, 2012 | |
Ana Enea | Nov 6, 2013 | |
Ged Ridgway | Nov 6, 2013 | |
Ana Enea | Nov 6, 2013 | |
Ged Ridgway | Nov 6, 2013 | |
Ana Enea | Nov 6, 2013 | |
Rayana Braich | Jul 18, 2012 | |
Ged Ridgway | Jun 18, 2012 | |
Tanmay Nath | Jun 19, 2012 | |
Ged Ridgway | Jun 19, 2012 | |
Tanmay Nath | Jun 19, 2012 | |