open-discussion
open-discussion > RE: Eddy current correction
Mar 13, 2013 12:03 PM | Simon Warfield
RE: Eddy current correction
You probably mean you are using a twice-refocused spin echo
sequence as in this paper by Reese et al. 2003:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12509...
This does a good job of reducing eddy current distortion.
There are still distortions from other sources such as geometric distortion from magnetic susceptibility differences
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/76749...
and there is likely to be motion during the acquisition which should be corrected.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12509...
This does a good job of reducing eddy current distortion.
There are still distortions from other sources such as geometric distortion from magnetic susceptibility differences
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/76749...
and there is likely to be motion during the acquisition which should be corrected.
Threaded View
Title | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
Paul Enggruber | Mar 12, 2013 | |
Niels Foit | Mar 13, 2013 | |
Paul Enggruber | Mar 13, 2013 | |
Simon Warfield | Mar 13, 2013 | |
Paul Enggruber | Mar 13, 2013 | |
Saad Jbabdi | Mar 13, 2013 | |