Ratings & Reviews   User Reviews  ( 11 )   Published Reviews  ( 1 )
Overall: 4.5 out of 5Installation: 4.5 out of 5Documentation: 4.5 out of 5
Individual Rating Results for ITK-SNAP

Review 11 of ITK-SNAP on Oct 20, 2009
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:  4 out of 5
Download/Installation Ease:  3 out of 5
Documentation/Support Quality:  4 out of 5
Ratings/Long-term Prospects Comments:  -decent semi-automated segmentation with snake (and other) tool(s) -depending on linux distro, sometimes crashed a few times on first compiling -may need to preprocess images to get stronger results (depending on scan sequence and structure of interest)
Review 10 of ITK-SNAP on Jun 21, 2009
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:  5 out of 5
Download/Installation Ease:  3 out of 5
Documentation/Support Quality:  5 out of 5
Ratings/Long-term Prospects Comments:  Not working for Ubuntu 64 bit
Review 9 of ITK-SNAP on Jan 24, 2009
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:  4 out of 5
Download/Installation Ease:  5 out of 5
Documentation/Support Quality:  5 out of 5
Ratings/Long-term Prospects Comments:  This is a pretty stable tool and nice for display. I had trouble with the snake tool in earlier versions and have not tried it in a while (lots of crashing and data loss).
Other Comments/Similar Tools:  I would love to see the ability to display crossing slices of the greyscale image with the 3d model... I am modeling white matter tracts and it would be VERY helpful to have this capability which appears in 3DSlicer and BioImage Suite.
Review 8 of ITK-SNAP on Jun 09, 2008
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:  5 out of 5
Download/Installation Ease:  5 out of 5
Documentation/Support Quality:  4 out of 5
Ratings/Long-term Prospects Comments:  Feature Requests -- 64 bit version. Actually theare are limitations in image dimension due to win32 opering system (max 2 MB ram for each process). However for images of the head win32 version is enought.  
Review 7 of ITK-SNAP on Jun 03, 2008
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:  4 out of 5
Download/Installation Ease:  5 out of 5
Documentation/Support Quality:  4 out of 5
Ratings/Long-term Prospects Comments:  Overall -- what it advertise it easy  Installation -- download and installation are easy on windows xp/vista  Documentation -- I think that could be more examples to beginners  Long-term -- I am using FSL and bioimage too. I would be more interesting to have in one FLS+ITSNAP+bioimage. Visualisation/rendering is the problem for all  Feature Requests -- Visualisation/rendering is the problem for all  
Other Comments/Similar Tools:  Similar Tool/Resource -- InVesalius, bioimage,   Tool/Resource Transition -- I am using all  
Review 6 of ITK-SNAP on Jun 02, 2008
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:  5 out of 5
Download/Installation Ease:  5 out of 5
Documentation/Support Quality:  4 out of 5
Ratings/Long-term Prospects Comments:  Overall -- - Very intuitive GUI - Good focus   
Review 5 of ITK-SNAP on Jun 02, 2008
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:  4 out of 5
Download/Installation Ease:  5 out of 5
Documentation/Support Quality:  3 out of 5
Ratings/Long-term Prospects Comments:  Overall -- It is easy to use and helpful.  Documentation -- For the snake propogation tool, it's a little hard to know what is going on. It is not clear how the combined force of curvature and advection is working from the figure provided.  Feature Requests -- Some sort of built-in segmentation algorithm (GM, WM, CSF) would be nice.  
Other Comments/Similar Tools:  Similar Tool/Resource -- I used its predecessor, IRIS, in published work.  Tool/Resource Transition -- None.  
Review 4 of ITK-SNAP on Jun 02, 2008
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:  5 out of 5
Download/Installation Ease:  5 out of 5
Documentation/Support Quality:  5 out of 5
Ratings/Long-term Prospects Comments:  Overall -- The graphic environment is completely user-friendly, allowing intuitive learning  Installation -- The current version works perfectly in   Long-term -- We are currently working in adapting the tool for neurosonography images and succeeding in tracing and rendering some structures. This tool has been so far the only one versatile enough for leting us do such improvements  Feature Requests -- Perhaps a "calibration menu" for those whose images are not DICOM and therefore have lost the metaimage information, in order to adjust the voxels value with "real" measures  
Other Comments/Similar Tools:  Similar Tool/Resource -- MRIcro, 3D Slice, ImageJ 3D toolkit,   Tool/Resource Transition -- This tool is faster and more powerful, images rendering and voxels statistics are more reliable.  
Review 3 of ITK-SNAP on Jun 02, 2008
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:  5 out of 5
Download/Installation Ease:  5 out of 5
Documentation/Support Quality:  5 out of 5
Ratings/Long-term Prospects Comments:  Overall -- Very easy to use and fast. Step-by-step wizards lead you through segmentation.  Installation -- No problems at all on Win32.  Documentation -- Tutorial took only 30 minutes.   Long-term -- This is very professional segmentation software with a few tools. The interface and documentation are great. More segmentation algorithms should be implemented in SNAP.  
Review 2 of ITK-SNAP on Jun 02, 2008
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:  5 out of 5
Download/Installation Ease:  5 out of 5
Documentation/Support Quality:  5 out of 5
Ratings/Long-term Prospects Comments:  Feature Requests -- The following two features are critical to our work: 1. A Spline editing tool (similar to the present Polygon tool). 2. Better mesh generation for non-uniform voxels with high aspect ratio, like 1 : 1 : 6.   
Other Comments/Similar Tools:  Similar Tool/Resource -- Analyze  Tool/Resource Transition -- Had to implement features 1. and 2. described in "Feature Requests"  
Next 10>>>