Ratings & Reviews   User Reviews  ( 2 )   
Overall: 4.5 out of 5Installation: 5 out of 5Documentation: 5 out of 5

Individual Rating Results for WFU_BPM

Review 2 of WFU_BPM on Feb 26, 2009
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:  5 out of 5
Download/Installation Ease:  5 out of 5
Documentation/Support Quality:  5 out of 5
Ratings/Long-term Prospects Comments:  WFU_BPM has been used as a guide when writing our own toolboxes and image i/o to work with SPM2 or SPM5. It contains many scripts that are very instructive for these purposes.

Review 1 of WFU_BPM on Feb 09, 2009
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:  4 out of 5
Ratings/Long-term Prospects Comments:  I have used BPM to correlate two imaging modalities on a voxel-wise basis and to examine the effects of one a variable of interest on my imaging variable while accounting for the effects of another imaging variable (for instance, looking at the effects of age on functional activation while correcting for volume on a voxel-wise basis). This is a useful approach for answering certain questions and as far as I know, there is not another tool that accomplishes quite the same thing.