help
help > RE: White Matter Connectivity Results
Dec 20, 2016 12:12 AM | Emmaly Owens
RE: White Matter Connectivity Results
Hi Pravesh,
Thank you very much for your response. The areas we are particularly concerned about are the bilateral "arches" that appear in our negative result. They seem to be almost identically positioned, with very similar coordinates on both sides, and it doesn't appear that the significant voxels are inferior enough to be sub-cortical structures. I'm not sure if this means we did something incorrectly in the setup steps, or if this is indicative of a certain selection we failed to make during the analysis steps, but the results seem strange given that we regressed out white matter.
Best,
Emmaly
Thank you very much for your response. The areas we are particularly concerned about are the bilateral "arches" that appear in our negative result. They seem to be almost identically positioned, with very similar coordinates on both sides, and it doesn't appear that the significant voxels are inferior enough to be sub-cortical structures. I'm not sure if this means we did something incorrectly in the setup steps, or if this is indicative of a certain selection we failed to make during the analysis steps, but the results seem strange given that we regressed out white matter.
Best,
Emmaly
Threaded View
Title | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
Emmaly Owens | Dec 14, 2016 | |
Emmaly Owens | Dec 19, 2016 | |
Pravesh Parekh | Dec 19, 2016 | |
Emmaly Owens | Dec 20, 2016 | |
Jeff Browndyke | Dec 20, 2016 | |
Emmaly Owens | Dec 21, 2016 | |
Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Dec 20, 2016 | |
Emmaly Owens | Dec 21, 2016 | |
Pravesh Parekh | Dec 20, 2016 | |
Pravesh Parekh | Dec 20, 2016 | |
Emmaly Owens | Dec 15, 2016 | |