help > RE: Subnetwork from dNBS not a subset of significant edges from edge-wise Welch's t-test
Sep 9, 2024  06:09 AM | Saqib Mamoon - Nanjing University of Science and Technology
RE: Subnetwork from dNBS not a subset of significant edges from edge-wise Welch's t-test

Hi everyone,


I have recently been introduced to this tool, which greatly interests me. I am sorry if my questions seem silly.


I have directional connectivity matrices with (240 control and 360 MCI) subjects. I want to measure the most significant edges where ( CN > MCI) or (MCI > CN), but I am not very sure how to analyze it. I put all subjects 600 in one folder. I have tried many experiments with varying thresholds from (2.5 to 4.18), sometimes I get a set of only subnetworks, sometimes 2 or 3. I have attached my design matrix. Could you please verify this is correct? 


Summary of my questions.


1) Is the design matrix correct for the task I am trying to do?


2) What does it mean if the tool dNBS outputs one, two, or three subnetworks? How could we analyze them?


3) How to measure the edges with CN > MCI or MCI > CN.


 


Thank you for your valuable time.


 


More info: In the design matrix, the first 360 are MCI subjects, and the next 240 are Normal controls.


Contrast: [-1,1]


signification 0.05


component size Extent


permutations 10k


statistical test t-test

Attachment: designMatrix.txt

Threaded View

TitleAuthorDate
Rahul Biswas Sep 12, 2023
RE: Subnetwork from dNBS not a subset of significant edges from edge-wise Welch's t-test
Saqib Mamoon Sep 9, 2024
Andrew Zalesky Sep 10, 2024
Saqib Mamoon Sep 18, 2024
Andrew Zalesky Sep 18, 2024
Saqib Mamoon Sep 19, 2024
Saqib Mamoon Sep 11, 2024
Andrew Zalesky Sep 12, 2023
Rahul Biswas Sep 12, 2023
Andrew Zalesky Sep 13, 2023
Rahul Biswas Sep 14, 2023