open-discussion
open-discussion > RE: Result of the 2010 PNAS paper
Apr 5, 2012 09:04 AM | Maarten Mennes
RE: Result of the 2010 PNAS paper
Hi Frank,
Sorry for being unclear about this. The maps are exactly the same as shown in Figure 1 of the Biswal et al. 2010 PNAS paper.
- Sex: 1 = Male > Female; 2 = Female > Male
- Age: 1 = increasing connectivity with increasing age (i.e., higher connectivity in older subjects); 2 = increasing connectivity with decreasing age (i.e. higher connectivity in younger subjects)
- Center: z values indicating the a effect of imaging center.
- group: positive z values represent positive connectivity (or ALFF/fALFF values that are significantly positive across subjects); negative z values represent negative group effects
I hope this clears things up.
Cheers,
Maarten
Sorry for being unclear about this. The maps are exactly the same as shown in Figure 1 of the Biswal et al. 2010 PNAS paper.
- Sex: 1 = Male > Female; 2 = Female > Male
- Age: 1 = increasing connectivity with increasing age (i.e., higher connectivity in older subjects); 2 = increasing connectivity with decreasing age (i.e. higher connectivity in younger subjects)
- Center: z values indicating the a effect of imaging center.
- group: positive z values represent positive connectivity (or ALFF/fALFF values that are significantly positive across subjects); negative z values represent negative group effects
I hope this clears things up.
Cheers,
Maarten
Threaded View
Title | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
Fang-Cheng Yeh | Apr 3, 2012 | |
Maarten Mennes | Apr 3, 2012 | |
Jonathan Ipser | Nov 18, 2013 | |
Maarten Mennes | Nov 18, 2013 | |
Fang-Cheng Yeh | Apr 4, 2012 | |
Maarten Mennes | Apr 5, 2012 | |
Fang-Cheng Yeh | Apr 17, 2012 | |
Maarten Mennes | Apr 18, 2012 | |
Fang-Cheng Yeh | Apr 18, 2012 | |
Fang-Cheng Yeh | Apr 18, 2012 | |
Fang-Cheng Yeh | Apr 5, 2012 | |