help
help > RE: Preprocessing and differing number of slices
May 24, 2013 04:05 AM | Alfonso Nieto-Castanon - Boston University
RE: Preprocessing and differing number of slices
Hi Dan,
Sorry for the late reply, I've modified the code (attached) so that all these questions will be asked before starting the preprocessing steps. I will keep this version in the software main fork so the next time we update the toolbox software to the NITRC site this will be the default behavior.
Best
Alfonso
Originally posted by Daniel Fitzgerald:
Sorry for the late reply, I've modified the code (attached) so that all these questions will be asked before starting the preprocessing steps. I will keep this version in the software main fork so the next time we update the toolbox software to the NITRC site this will be the default behavior.
Best
Alfonso
Originally posted by Daniel Fitzgerald:
Hi Alfonso,
Just a followup - the change in code does indeed work, but now the slice order gets asked each time the number of slices changes. I guess not a big deal for most people with all the same number but in cases where we have mixed number of slices among subjects it gets pretty tedious to wait for each matching set to finish in order to enter the subsequent slice orders.
Maybe if there were a way to indicate all subjects should be given ascending/descending order (probably interleaved would be more difficult) or if the order prompts were brought up before anything got pre-processed?
Anyway, thanks for the fix, I'm certainly glad we can proceed with the wizard entry now that the issue is resolved.
Best regards,
Dan
Just a followup - the change in code does indeed work, but now the slice order gets asked each time the number of slices changes. I guess not a big deal for most people with all the same number but in cases where we have mixed number of slices among subjects it gets pretty tedious to wait for each matching set to finish in order to enter the subsequent slice orders.
Maybe if there were a way to indicate all subjects should be given ascending/descending order (probably interleaved would be more difficult) or if the order prompts were brought up before anything got pre-processed?
Anyway, thanks for the fix, I'm certainly glad we can proceed with the wizard entry now that the issue is resolved.
Best regards,
Dan
Threaded View
| Title | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Daniel Fitzgerald | Mar 18, 2013 | |
| Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Mar 20, 2013 | |
| Daniel Fitzgerald | Apr 22, 2014 | |
| Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Apr 22, 2014 | |
| Daniel Fitzgerald | Apr 16, 2013 | |
| Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | May 24, 2013 | |