Ratings & Reviews   User Reviews  ( 3 )   
Overall: 4.5 out of 5Installation: 4 out of 5Documentation: 3 out of 5

Individual Rating Results for Computational Morphometry Toolkit (CMTK)

Review 3 of Computational Morphometry Toolkit (CMTK) on Dec 27, 2018
Version Reviewed:  3.3.1
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:  5 out of 5
Download/Installation Ease:  5 out of 5
Documentation/Support Quality:  3 out of 5
Ratings/Long-term Prospects Comments:  I found this tool perfect for my needs. I have not used all the features, but what I have needed worked out of the box. Nice job.

Review 2 of Computational Morphometry Toolkit (CMTK) on Jul 24, 2013
Version Reviewed:  2.3
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:  5 out of 5
Download/Installation Ease:  3 out of 5
Documentation/Support Quality:  5 out of 5

Review 1 of Computational Morphometry Toolkit (CMTK) on Oct 04, 2011
Version Reviewed:  2.0.0
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:  4 out of 5
Download/Installation Ease:  4 out of 5
Documentation/Support Quality:  1 out of 5
Ratings/Long-term Prospects Comments:  This is an excellent and powerful tool that performs very well. The greatest weakness is a lack of documentation which makes it virtually impossible to harness fully the power of the tool.
Administrator comment to review 1: Point taken. The idea was to have a simple, easy-to-read User Guide (download through NITRC or the InsightJournal) for a quick overview of the major processing stages and tools. Complete documentation of all tool options, including all advanced functions, should be provided by the command line help ("--help" and "--help-all"). It seems you feel something is missing in between the two. For now, I have added to the Wiki a list of all CMTK tools grouped by function, which should help identify the right tool for a given task (https://neuro.sri.com/cmtk/wiki/index.php/Getting_started_%28users%29). I'll be happy to consider further suggestions. Thanks.