help
help > Non-parametric cluster correction single subj
Nov 23, 2017 03:11 AM | Stephen L. - Coma Science Group, GIGA-Consciousness, Hospital & University of Liege
Non-parametric cluster correction single subj
Dear Alfonso,
I think I ran into a bug, or at least an undocumented limitation.
I would like to use a non-parametric cluster correction for a single subject against a control group.
The calculation of the permutation test runs fine, but after the calculation, I get a threshold equivalent to k > 1 (thus cluster uncorrected, equivalent to cluster-size = 0) for any non-parametric threshold type I choose, and any threshold value!
Clearly this means that the permutation test could not work correctly in this instance. However I can make it work with all my other studies involving group A vs group B, or session 1 vs session 2, so I guess the limitation here is because one group contains only a single subject.
Is it really impossible to do a permutation test with only a single subject? If that's the case, maybe adding a warning window would be useful? (to avoid experimenters using the non-parametric test when in fact it does not correct anything).
Thank you very much for clarifying this issue and helping!
Warm regards,
Stephen Larroque
I think I ran into a bug, or at least an undocumented limitation.
I would like to use a non-parametric cluster correction for a single subject against a control group.
The calculation of the permutation test runs fine, but after the calculation, I get a threshold equivalent to k > 1 (thus cluster uncorrected, equivalent to cluster-size = 0) for any non-parametric threshold type I choose, and any threshold value!
Clearly this means that the permutation test could not work correctly in this instance. However I can make it work with all my other studies involving group A vs group B, or session 1 vs session 2, so I guess the limitation here is because one group contains only a single subject.
Is it really impossible to do a permutation test with only a single subject? If that's the case, maybe adding a warning window would be useful? (to avoid experimenters using the non-parametric test when in fact it does not correct anything).
Thank you very much for clarifying this issue and helping!
Warm regards,
Stephen Larroque
Threaded View
Title | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
Stephen L. | Nov 23, 2017 | |
Stephen L. | Nov 27, 2017 | |
Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Nov 29, 2017 | |
Stephen L. | Nov 30, 2017 | |
Stephen L. | Nov 30, 2017 | |
Stephen L. | Dec 10, 2017 | |
Stephen L. | Dec 10, 2017 | |
Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Dec 11, 2017 | |
Stephen L. | Feb 8, 2018 | |
Stephen L. | Feb 8, 2018 | |
Stephen L. | Dec 11, 2017 | |