help
help > RE: Non-parametric cluster correction single subj
Nov 30, 2017 01:11 AM | Stephen L. - Coma Science Group, GIGA-Consciousness, Hospital & University of Liege
RE: Non-parametric cluster correction single subj
But just a thought I had, but I am no expert at all in permutation
tests as I am still discovering them: I think it might not
necessarily be a bug but an inherent feature of the permutation
test at the group level with very skewed groups: since we only have
one subject in GROUP_A, any other permutation is just (GROUP_B - 1
GROUP_B's subject + 1 GROUP_A's patient), so I guess the
variability will be in fact close to none and the result of the
permutations always be very close to GROUP_B. So when we do a
contrast, the correct labelling will be super significant compared
to all other permutations of the labels, since all permutations
will basically be the GROUP_B average connectivity.
If this reasoning is correct, this means that it is useless to do a permutation test with only a single subject in one group, because anyway the controls group will always ensure a stable null hypothesis based on only the controls, thus it will always make any voxel significant in the single subject when we do a contrast... I don't know if this makes sense :-/
If this reasoning is correct, this means that it is useless to do a permutation test with only a single subject in one group, because anyway the controls group will always ensure a stable null hypothesis based on only the controls, thus it will always make any voxel significant in the single subject when we do a contrast... I don't know if this makes sense :-/
Threaded View
Title | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
Stephen L. | Nov 23, 2017 | |
Stephen L. | Nov 27, 2017 | |
Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Nov 29, 2017 | |
Stephen L. | Nov 30, 2017 | |
Stephen L. | Nov 30, 2017 | |
Stephen L. | Dec 10, 2017 | |
Stephen L. | Dec 10, 2017 | |
Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Dec 11, 2017 | |
Stephen L. | Feb 8, 2018 | |
Stephen L. | Feb 8, 2018 | |
Stephen L. | Dec 11, 2017 | |