help
help > RE: Non-parametric cluster correction single subj
Feb 8, 2018 09:02 PM | Stephen L. - Coma Science Group, GIGA-Consciousness, Hospital & University of Liege
RE: Non-parametric cluster correction single subj
Originally posted by Alfonso Nieto-Castanon:
After reading a bit more about non-parametric issues for functional mri, I think I understand better the above sentence, and that's a great thing you took this approach. When you mention FSL, are referring specifically to FSL PALM? If that's the case, I read that the approaches implemented there are the state-of-the-art and more generic, so that's great if CONN implements a similar approach! :D
Best!
Stephen Larroque
... The main
advantage of this "randomization of residuals" approach (e.g. CONN,
FSL) compared to the "permutations of residuals" or purely
"permutation" approaches (e.g. SnPM, BROCCOLI) is that it works
exactly in the same way for all GLM analyses, while a permutation
approach requires different permutation schemes for different sorts
of analyses and it does not apply to certain scenarios (e.g.
one-sample t-test)...
After reading a bit more about non-parametric issues for functional mri, I think I understand better the above sentence, and that's a great thing you took this approach. When you mention FSL, are referring specifically to FSL PALM? If that's the case, I read that the approaches implemented there are the state-of-the-art and more generic, so that's great if CONN implements a similar approach! :D
Best!
Stephen Larroque
Threaded View
| Title | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Stephen L. | Nov 23, 2017 | |
| Stephen L. | Nov 27, 2017 | |
| Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Nov 29, 2017 | |
| Stephen L. | Nov 30, 2017 | |
| Stephen L. | Nov 30, 2017 | |
| Stephen L. | Dec 10, 2017 | |
| Stephen L. | Dec 10, 2017 | |
| Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Dec 11, 2017 | |
| Stephen L. | Feb 8, 2018 | |
| Stephen L. | Feb 8, 2018 | |
| Stephen L. | Dec 11, 2017 | |