open-discussion
open-discussion > RE: AAAS: Your Paper MUST include Data and Code
Mar 10, 2011 05:03 PM | Torsten Rohlfing
RE: AAAS: Your Paper MUST include Data and Code
Originally posted by Luis Ibanez:
Another question I think is not getting enough attention here is, under what terms such data (and code) are available. In particular, what happens if the rights to the data are not held by the paper authors? Say, I write a paper using slightly modified brain images from the IBSR repository (just as a random example of a shared data resource). I cannot distribute those images to anyone because the IBSR use conditions prevent me from doing it. I can give the modified images back to IBSR and ask them to make them available on my behalf, but they are not obligated to. If they do choose to distribute the modified data, they could impose conditions on them that some may consider unreasonable. Are these data then still formally available? The same goes for any other data repository that imposes non-proliferation conditions upon data users (which is pretty much every such resource that I am aware of).
“Science policy for some time has been that ALL
DATA NECESSARY to
understand, assess, and extend the conclusions of the manuscript must
be available to ANY reader of Science (see
www.sciencemag.org/site/feature/contribinfo ) “
understand, assess, and extend the conclusions of the manuscript must
be available to ANY reader of Science (see
www.sciencemag.org/site/feature/contribinfo ) “
Another question I think is not getting enough attention here is, under what terms such data (and code) are available. In particular, what happens if the rights to the data are not held by the paper authors? Say, I write a paper using slightly modified brain images from the IBSR repository (just as a random example of a shared data resource). I cannot distribute those images to anyone because the IBSR use conditions prevent me from doing it. I can give the modified images back to IBSR and ask them to make them available on my behalf, but they are not obligated to. If they do choose to distribute the modified data, they could impose conditions on them that some may consider unreasonable. Are these data then still formally available? The same goes for any other data repository that imposes non-proliferation conditions upon data users (which is pretty much every such resource that I am aware of).
Threaded View
Title | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
Luis Ibanez | Mar 10, 2011 | |
hongtu zhu | Mar 13, 2011 | |
Luis Ibanez | Mar 13, 2011 | |
Matthew Brett | Mar 13, 2011 | |
Isaiah Norton | Mar 13, 2011 | |
Torsten Rohlfing | Mar 10, 2011 | |
Luis Ibanez | Mar 11, 2011 | |
Daniel Kimberg | Mar 10, 2011 | |
Cinly Ooi | Mar 10, 2011 | |
Torsten Rohlfing | Mar 10, 2011 | |
Cinly Ooi | Mar 10, 2011 | |
Torsten Rohlfing | Mar 10, 2011 | |
Cinly Ooi | Mar 10, 2011 | |
Torsten Rohlfing | Mar 10, 2011 | |
Cinly Ooi | Mar 10, 2011 | |
Matthew Brett | Mar 10, 2011 | |
Pierre Bellec | Mar 10, 2011 | |
Luis Ibanez | Mar 11, 2011 | |
Matthew Brett | Mar 10, 2011 | |
Cinly Ooi | Mar 10, 2011 | |
Cinly Ooi | Mar 10, 2011 | |
Torsten Rohlfing | Mar 10, 2011 | |
Daniel Kimberg | Mar 10, 2011 | |
Cinly Ooi | Mar 10, 2011 | |