open-discussion > RE: More effective than gratis/libre?
Oct 24, 2013  06:10 PM | Torsten Rohlfing
RE: More effective than gratis/libre?
Originally posted by Andrew Worth:
Ged, Neuromorphometrics isn't suing anybody!  I was happy to openly provide data for the MICCAI Challenges because I want you to get hooked: this stuff is so good you'll want more once you get a taste.  The thing is, that data is so last-year.  We're constantly combing through the entire database, fixing problems, improving consistency and adding new regions of interest, along with additional subjects.  The 2013 subscription will include 30 ADNI scans along with 15 more test-retest subjects (scanned twice and labeled twice).

Ah, I had been holding back, but now I just have to ask...

Andy: will the ADNI scans in your 2013 subscriptions come under your existing license, or will they have additional strings attached? I am, of course, asking about the requirement to put ADNI on the author list of any papers that one publishes using their data.

Best,
  Torsten

Threaded View

TitleAuthorDate
Andrew Worth Oct 22, 2013
Andrew Worth Nov 27, 2013
Andrew Worth Nov 9, 2013
Ronald Pierson Nov 10, 2013
Andrew Worth Oct 24, 2013
RE: More effective than gratis/libre?
Torsten Rohlfing Oct 24, 2013
Andrew Worth Oct 24, 2013
Torsten Rohlfing Oct 25, 2013
Cinly Ooi Oct 22, 2013
Bennett Landman Oct 22, 2013
Matthew Brett Oct 22, 2013
vsochat Oct 22, 2013
Torsten Rohlfing Oct 22, 2013
vsochat Oct 22, 2013
Torsten Rohlfing Oct 22, 2013
Bennett Landman Oct 22, 2013
Ged Ridgway Oct 23, 2013
Bennett Landman Oct 23, 2013
Luis Ibanez Oct 23, 2013
Ged Ridgway Oct 23, 2013
Luis Ibanez Oct 24, 2013
Ged Ridgway Oct 24, 2013
Luis Ibanez Oct 27, 2013
Manuel Jorge Cardoso Oct 29, 2013
Andrew Worth Oct 29, 2013
Ronald Pierson Oct 24, 2013
Torsten Rohlfing Oct 24, 2013
Ged Ridgway Oct 24, 2013
Ian Malone Oct 24, 2013
Ian Malone Oct 24, 2013
Torsten Rohlfing Oct 22, 2013
Arno Klein Oct 22, 2013
Ged Ridgway Oct 22, 2013